Oh my: 'Deceit and favouritism'
Over in Vancouver Courier land, my esteemed colleague Mike Howell appears unimpressed that Vision Vancouver refused to show him an advanced copy of their 2008 election financial statements.
"Your dedicated scribe’s efforts to get an early look last week at Vision Vancouver’s campaign finance documents was blindsided by deceit and favouritism," Howell writes, with a certain degree of tongue planted in cheek.
"I’m, apparently, not in the party’s good books."
It seems Howell asked the Visionites for their campaign records. Instead, the party chose to pass it on to the no-less-esteemed Frances Bula, who wrote up a story in Friday's Globe.
"Political parties playing favourites is not news, folks. It happens all the time," Howell writes.
"Vision did this during the campaign, handing over its election platform to the Vancouver Sun - the same paper that had a reporter call up the party in the fall and ask if it had a mayoral candidate."
(I'll leave that point alone.)
"My point here is that I was jerked around," Howell concludes.
Reporters always face a bit of a dilemma when a politico phones up offering an "exclusive" on a story. You find yourself balancing the interests of the story itself, which contain some kernel of intrigue, and the interests of the person offering the story, who undoubtedly benefit from its publishing in some way. If reporters published every "exclusive" offered to them in this city, there would be a whole lot more misinformation flying around.
With that said, no reporter I know earns their keep purely on strategic party leaks. It's a dangerous game, as Howell points out on his blog, one that does no one (except, perhaps, the party themselves) any favours in the long run.
At the same time, I don't begrudge political parties from playing favourites, as it were. Particularly during an election, media coverage is at a premium. As was the case with the election platform leak to the Sun, parties have to juggle pissing off other reporters vs. the benefits of giving an "exclusive." In this case, Gregor Robertson held the front page of the Sun, as did Peter Ladner when the NPA leaked their platform to the Sun one week earlier.
However, I think it's fair to say there were a few reporters who had been covering the political scene all year - including all those weekend AGMs and leadership votes - that were a little miffed when both parties chose to release platforms to a paper that, at that point, had paid little attention to the campaign.
Read the rest of Mike's post here.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 05:58PM